Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Current »


 

Just as we saw for the study's overall score, the most important thing to look at for a task is success rate – how many participants found the correct answer?

This is typically rated out of 10 or 100. For example, a score of 71 means that 71% of the time, participants arrived at a correct answer:

 

The same rough markers we used for overall scores hold true for individual tasks:

Success scoreMeaning
0-50Most participants had real trouble with the task.
If they understood the task properly, then the tree failed to do its job.
If they didn’t understand the task (see ~Where people went below), then you won’t be able to judge the tree based on this task alone.
50-65A mixed bag: most found it, but quite a few didn’t.
This usually indicates that the tree is roughly right for this task, but there are specific topics that are luring some users off the correct paths.
65+Most participants succeeded.
Your tree is performing well for this task, and probably only needs minor tweaks to corral the wayward few.

 

Success rate is a good general indicator of the effectiveness of our tree, but immediately we want to dig deeper. For example, if we have a success rate of 27% on a task, we naturally want to ask “Where are all these people going wrong?”. For that, we need to look at the paths they took through our tree.

 


Next: Where they went

 

  • No labels